Greenwashing as grassroots or no roots social movement
A multi-platform approach to social media monitoring of hashtag activism
Keywords:greenwashing, Hashtag activism, social media monitoring, social movements, climate change
This article discusses the use of the #greenwashing hashtag around the issues of sustainability, climate change, and other environmental concerns of which greenwashing is a part. The article addresses the question of whether anti-greenwashing constitutes an organized social movement or is a grassroots effort that follows the ebb and flow of events as they arise and fall during the year? The multi-platform approach taken in this study analyses the discourse around key topics driving #greenwashing exploring the issue of greenwashing through an analysis of social media, including Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and Twitter, as well as an analysis of the spread of greenwashing related stories on news media. The findings demonstrate that interest in greenwashing is tied to key events during the year, like Earth Day and COP26 but that interest is diminished to “normal” levels at other times. The absence of toxicity in the language of social media posts does not support strategic amplification, a tactic to boost interest in an issue, and an analysis of the polarity of sentiment regarding social media posts did not find support in either negative or positive feelings expressed.
Adi, A. (2018). #Sustainability on Twitter: Loose Ties and Green-Washing CSR. In G. Grigore et al. (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Digital Communities. London, UK: Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility.
Alperstein, N. (2019). Celebrity and Mediated Social Connections: Fans, Friends, and Followers in the Digital Age. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alperstein, N. (2021). Conflict and Contentiousness: Network Connections and Pockets of Resistance in Social Movements. In Performing Media Activism in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73804-4_4
Assoune, A. (n.d.) Fast Fashion Brands Accused of Greenwashing. Panaprium.com. https://www.panaprium.com/blogs/i/fast-fashion-brands-accused-of-greenwashing
Auld, G. (2018). Transforming markets? Activists’ strategic orientations and engagement with private governance. Organization & Environment, 33(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618811299
Awal, M.R., Cao, R, Mitrovic, S., et al. (2020). On analyzing anti-social behaviors amid COVID-19 pandemic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.10712
Blumer, H. (1969). Collective behavior. In Lee A.M., (Ed.), Principles of sociology (3rd Ed.). New York: Barnes and Noble.
boyd, d. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi, ed. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39-85). New York: Routledge.
Christiansen, J. (2011). Four Stages of Social Movements. In Theories of Social Movements. pp. 14-25. Calif.: Salem Press.
CrowdTangle (n.d.) A tool from Meta to help follow, analyze, and report on what’s happening across social media. https://www.crowdtangle.com/.
Dahl, R. (2010). Green washing: Do you know what you're buying? Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(6), A246–A252. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.118-a246
de la Merced, M. (January 23, 2022). Nelson Peltz Takes Aim at Unilever. The New York Times/Dealbook. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/23/business/dealbook/unilever-glaxo-nelson-peltz-trian.html?
FTC (n.d.) Green Guides: Environmentally Friendly Products: FTC’s Green Guides. FTC.gov. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media-resources/truth-advertising/green-guides
Fuchs, C. (2006). The Self-Organization of Social Movements. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19(1), 101-137.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets on the Streets. UK: Pluto Press. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30772
Google Trends (n.d.) Search for examples of greenwashing. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=greenwashing%20examples&date=all
Gruzd, A., & Mai, P. (2022). Communalytic: A Research Tool For Studying Online Communities and Online Discourse. https://Communalytic.com
Gruzd, A., Mai, P., & Vahedi, Z. (2020). Studying anti-social behavior on Reddit with Communalytic. Semantic Scholar. DOI:10.31124/advance.12453749.v1 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Studying-Anti-Social-Behaviour-on-Reddit-with-Gruzd-Mai/45a79dee30fe649583889573d16be1b316cf72d1
Hodson, J., Dale, A. & Petersen, B. (2018). The Instagram #climatechange hashtag community does it impact social capital and community agency? The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 12(3/4), 17-35.
Laser, S., Chen, X., Lompe, M., et al. (n.d.). Greenwashing, in_authenticity & protest.* Following the dynamics and relations of an ambiguous term on Twitter and the Web. DigitalMethods.net. https://www.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiSummerSchoolGreenwashing#Group_1:_Twitter_activity_on_35Greenwashing
Lyon, T. (2012). Good cop/bad cop: Environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
MediaCloud (n.d). MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/media-cloud/overview/.
Miller, T., & Maxwell, R. (2017). Greenwashing Culture (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659251.
Moyer, B. (1990). Movement Action Plan. The Practical Strategies. San Francisco: Social Movement Empowerment Project.
Pascual-Ferra, P., Alperstein, N., & Barnett, D. (2021). A Multi-Platform Approach to Monitoring Negative Dominance for Covid-19 Vaccine-Related Information Online. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938423/.
Pew Research Center (August 15, 2016). The hashtag #BlackLivesMatter emerges: Social activism on Twitter. PewResearch.org. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/08/15/the-hashtag-blacklivesmatter-emerges-social-activism-on-twitter/.
Phillips, W. (May 22, 2018). The Oxygen of Amplification: Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators. Data&Society.net. https://datasociety.net/library/oxygen-of-amplification/
Pimonenko, T., Bilan, Y., Horák, J., Starchenko, L., & Gajda, W. (2020). Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing under Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(4), 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041679.
Rogers, R. (2018). Digital Traces in Context| Otherwise Engaged: Social Media from Vanity Metrics to Critical Analytics. International Journal of Communication, 12(23). https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6407/2248
Seung-Pyo, J., Yoo, HS & Choi, S. (2018). Ten years of research change using Google Trends: From the perspective of big data utilizations and applications, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 130, 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.009.
Spors, F. (20 May 2021). How to spot greenwashing – and how to stop it. Weforum.org. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/05/how-spot-greenwashing/
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. New York: Routledge.
Venturini, T., & Munk, A. K. (2021). Controversy Mapping. Cambridge, UK:Polity Press. https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781509544523
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).